Social Media Privacy Laws-Free-Samples for Students-Myassignment

Question: Discusss about the Social media privacy laws. Answer: Privacy is essential in the workplace and this is a proper area of development of the law in different workplaces in all over the world. There are different considerations related to privacy in the law setting in employment along with different current issues considered by courts, employers as well as employees lawyers are different novels wherein guidance is scarce in nature. There are different issues that are developing such as: Proper monitoring of the communication of employees or different conducts at workplace that includes proper usage of internet, telephone calls, text messaging as well as e-mails too). Secondly, proper monitoring or making different decisions related to employment that is properly based on use of social media of employees such as LinkedIn, Twitter, and blogging as well. Lastly, proper usage of different technologies that is new in nature helps in global positioning system along with different other applications such as Google Maps or keeping proper track on employees as this will help in monitoring the activities performed by employees while they are working in their offices as well as when they are far away from their work stations as well (Moorhead et al. 2013). According to Wodak and Meyer (2015), social network is made of different set of social actors as well as dynamic ties between the different actors. There are different concerns related to the privacy of the social networking services that is subset of the privacy of data. This involves proper right of mandating privacy personally that is concerning storing as well as re purposing proper provisions to the third parties as well. Proper privacy is required in the different offices as well in the lives of the individuals. Proper law has to be ascertained as well as maintained in the organization in order to protect the employees as well as job applicants privacy in workplace. Proper social media includes different things from personal mail accounts of the individuals such as Facebook, Instagram as well as other pinterest as well (Taddicken 2014). According to Van Der Veldenand El Emam (2013), Social Media privacy rights is defined as the different rights of the individuals wherein during conducting different interviews of the candidates, the password of the personal accounts cannot be asked for, they cannot get with the social media account with sharing their passwords as well(Nolin 2014). The managers of the different organization cannot ask for making any kind of changes in the different privacy settings on the social media accounts and this is not good in nature in order to understand the personal information of the different employees in the organization. The companies need to properly understand the different requirements of the employees in the organization as there is a personal space that has to be provided to the employees in every organization (Marwickand Boyd 2014). However, according to Marwickand Boyd (2014), it has been seen that the employer has the right to access the data properly of the employees; however there are different issues that has to be sorted out in order to properly maintain secrecy in the information that is provided. There is different kind of privacy offered to the individuals in the organization as this will help in providing proper information that is required to be known by the employees as well as employers of the organization. The privacy is required in the social media of the employees in the organization as there can be different risks that can arise from different data collection methods as this will help in identifying the different personal information from the different employees and spread among the third parties as well(Houston et al. 2015). There is different software that has been introduced in the market as this can hack the different important information from the different employees by hacking into their system. This will have huge impact on the personal lives of the individuals (Holmes and O'loughlin 2014). Furthermore, this Application Programming Interface is set of different protocols as well as tools that will help in building software that can hack different personal information of the different employees. Furthermore, there are different new software wherein the bank accounts can be hacked of the employees as well as other normal individuals by sending different messages as well OTP pins that can have huge control on the different information provided by the clients. In this technique, the employees of the organization disclose their OTPs that have been sent to them and this will have huge influence on the different personal credentials f the employees in the organization as well. In the recent era, there have been different issues relating to the privacy concerns of the information to the third parties as well as in other individuals as well. There are different laws that have been made wherein the employer of the organization cannot have any kind of access into the personal accounts of the employees as this is illegal in nature. The Privacy Act of 1974 helps in stating that there is no such agency wherein the record of the employees in the organization cannot be disclosed to any other individuals or third parties as this can have huge negative impact on the individuals and this can release the information as well(Boyd 2014). There is another law wherein it states that there is a freedom of information act in the different organizations wherein the information can be disclosed to other parties or third parties and this requires proper explanation of requiring such data as well(Van Dijck 2013). There have been different cases of online victimization wherein the different social networks are designed in order to understand the different kind of social interaction with the individuals. This will have huge impact on the personal lives of the individuals and this can cause issues and motivate the offenders to perform such activities more often. There should be different other proper laws that has to be properly ascertained in order to reduce such issues in different organizations and this can help in preventing different other issues as well. Therefore, it can be said that proper positive usage of the online social networking sites is required in order to promote in order to reduce the online victimization iss ues as well. Social media is an important platform to interact and connect with each other. The social media is mainly related to technologies which are computer-mediated that mainly facilitate the ways by which information, career and ideas. The interests of the members of social media and the various expressions are shared via the virtual communities. The services that are provided by social media are interactive in nature (Acquisti, Brandimarte and Loewenstein 2015). The content that is generated by the users which are related to the various comments or posts, the videos and the posts are the main parts of social media. The social networks are developed online with the help of social media by connecting the profiles of the users with the various other individuals or the groups of people. Social media has a major influence on the business activities of the organization and the performance of the business as well (Rainie et al. 2013). There are mainly four channels with the help of which the resources of social media can transform into the performance business capabilities: The first major channel is the social capital which mainly represents the level up to which the social media firms and the organizations affects the relationships with the society and degree till which the various organizations use social media. The level up to which social media exposes the likings of the consumers and thereby increases the financial capabilities of the firms and also increases donations, Social media also helps in performing activities related to marketing of the organizations and the ways by which the resources are used to increase the capabilities of the firms. The corporate networking capabilities of the firms are also facilitated by functions of social media. The networking related capabilities of the organization can also increase the operational performance of the organizations (Horvitz and Mulligan 2015). The four different tools that are used by the organizations mainly engage the suppliers, customers, experts and the employees of the organizations related to development of the services and products with the use of the social media. The policies related to social media of the organizations are now able to gain attention with the help of the huge amount of employees who comment, like, share and tweet with respect to the various aspects of life. However, the view of the professionals of human resources is that the abuses related to IT have increased in the last few years as well. The concern of the employers is growing with respect to the ways by which the use of social media by their employees can be managed and the impact of these activities on the brand is also analyzed (Drouin et al. 2015). The policies related to social media are formulated to protect the reputations of the companies. The organizations without any social media presence also need to analyze the impacts of the activities of the employees in the social media. The issues related to social media created by the employees can have a huge impact on the business related operations of the employees. Many organizations however have social media policies that are unlawful in nature. The organizations therefore need to retool the policies that are formulated so that the rights of the employees are compromised and also protect them. There are many elements that are related to successful policies of social media which are discussed further. The first element is related to the creation of a safe space for the employees where they can share the concerns they have before they go online (Bolton et al. 2013). The employees should have the space to share their issues with supervisors of the organizations before an activity is created online. The National Labor Relations Act has the given the rights to the employees regarding their activity of bargaining for their own protection. These laws that are laid by the body have further created confusion among the employers regarding their policies related to social media. The information which is treated as confidential for the organizations should be further communicated to the employees and the policies need to be formulated in such a way so that the employees are not able to share the information. The consequences related to the actions and activities of the employees on social media can have huge impact on the organizational operations (Obar and Wildman 2015). The employees need to be held responsible for their actions on the social media platforms. The sharing of any type of post or videos on the social media by the employees can affect the image of the brands. The proper spokespersons should be appointed by the organizations so that they can answer the questions related to the company. The proper way by which the employees can engage others in the process should be communicated to the employees. The activities of the employees on social media that are considered to be illegal with respect to the trademark of the company should be included in the policies. The culture of the organization is also reflected in the policies related to social media (Gritzalis et al. 2014). However, the just formulating a particular social media policy for an organization is not enough. The companies also need to invest effort and time in the training related to employees so that the policies can be successful. Human behavior cannot be controlled by the policies and procedures formulated by the organizations (Madden et al. 2013). The laws related to social media cannot stop the employees from performing any type of crime or debacle. The social media activities of the employees are in many ways uncontrollable in nature. The privacy of the employees and the dignity of the organizations are not in the hands of the employers. The laws that have been formulated for the privacy of the employees on the social media platforms are not that effective. The ways by which the policies of the company can be formulated and the activities of the employees related to the policies cannot be formulated. The privacy laws related to social media are therefore a dream for the companies and the employees. The control of privacy of the employees and the organizations cannot be controlled and it is therefore a dream for the organizations. References Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L. and Loewenstein, G., 2015. Privacy and human behavior in the age of information.Science,347(6221), pp.509-514. Bolton, R.N., Parasuraman, A., Hoefnagels, A., Migchels, N., Kabadayi, S., Gruber, T., Komarova Loureiro, Y. and Solnet, D., 2013. Understanding Generation Y and their use of social media: a review and research agenda.Journal of Service Management,24(3), pp.245-267. Boyd, D., 2014.It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press. Drouin, M., OConnor, K.W., Schmidt, G.B. and Miller, D.A., 2015. Facebook fired: Legal perspectives and young adults opinions on the use of social media in hiring and firing decisions.Computers in Human Behavior,46, pp.123-128. Gritzalis, D., Kandias, M., Stavrou, V. and Mitrou, L., 2014. History of information: the case of privacy and security in social media. InProc. of the History of Information Conference(pp. 283-310). Holmes, K.M. and O'loughlin, N., 2014. The experiences of people with learning disabilities on social networking sites.British Journal of Learning Disabilities,42(1), pp.1-5. Horvitz, E. and Mulligan, D., 2015. Data, privacy, and the greater good.Science,349(6245), pp.253-255. Houston, J.B., Hawthorne, J., Perreault, M.F., Park, E.H., Goldstein Hode, M., Halliwell, M.R., Turner McGowen, S.E., Davis, R., Vaid, S., McElderry, J.A. and Griffith, S.A., 2015. Social media and disasters: a functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research.Disasters,39(1), pp.1-22. Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Cortesi, S., Gasser, U., Duggan, M., Smith, A. and Beaton, M., 2013. Teens, social media, and privacy.Pew Research Center,21, pp.2-86. Marwick, A.E. and Boyd, D., 2014. Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media.New Media Society,16(7), pp.1051-1067. Moorhead, S.A., Hazlett, D.E., Harrison, L., Carroll, J.K., Irwin, A. and Hoving, C., 2013. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication.Journal of medical Internet research,15(4). Nolin, J., 2014. But What Happens at the Back End? A review of van Dijck, Jos. The culture of connectivity: a critical history of social media.Information research,19(2). Obar, J.A. and Wildman, S.S., 2015. Social media definition and the governance challenge: An introduction to the special issue. Rainie, L., Kiesler, S., Kang, R., Madden, M., Duggan, M., Brown, S. and Dabbish, L., 2013. Anonymity, privacy, and security online.Pew Research Center,5. Taddicken, M., 2014. The privacy paradoxin the social web: The impact of privacy concerns, individual characteristics, and the perceived social relevance on different forms of self?disclosure.Journal of Computer?Mediated Communication,19(2), pp.248-273. Van Der Velden, M. and El Emam, K., 2013. Not all my friends need to know: a qualitative study of teenage patients, privacy, and social media.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association,20(1), pp.16-24. Van Dijck, J., 2013.The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press. Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. eds., 2015.Methods of critical discourse studies. Sage.